Southern California Campuses Shaken By Mass Shooting With Student Victims

Southern California Campuses Shaken By Mass Shooting With Student Victims

Southern California Campuses Shaken By Mass Shooting With Student Victims.

Joe Bowman

November 9, 2018


Southern California colleges feared for the worst when news spread that a gunman had opened fire at Borderline Bar & Grill, in Thousand Oaks, Calif., Wednesday night. The bar’s weekly “college night” opens its doors to students as young as 18. The event attracts hundreds of young people, many of them students.

Among the 12 people shot and killed were Alania Housley, a freshman at Pepperdine University. The Los Angeles Times reported that she was studying English, hoped to go to law school and had a passion for music.

Pepperdine reported that it has identified 16 of its students who were present when the terror started at Borderline. The university is focused on helping those mourning Housley and also those experiencing trauma because of the mass shooting.

California Lutheran University announced that it was calling off classes Thursday and today and setting up special religious services and outreach efforts. A number of its students were present. Justin Meek, a recent graduate, was among those killed. Local television stations reported that he worked at Borderline but was there with friends, off-duty on Wednesday night. Witnesses said he was killed while trying to protect others.

Noel Sparks, a student at Moorpark College, was also among those killed. Press accounts described how her friends who were with her at the bar grew more and more worried as they couldn’t reach her after the shootings.

Moorpark, which has confirmed that it had other students present at Borderline, is also reaching out to offer support.

Other Shootings

Wednesday night’s mass shooting was hardly the first to have an impact on higher education. On Friday, a gunman shot and killed a student and a professor at Florida State University when he stormed into a yoga studio in Tallahassee. And that shooting came less than a week after an avowed anti-Semite killed 11 at a Pittsburgh synagogue. Those murdered included a professor and a retired researcher at the University of Pittsburgh.

The first prominent mass shooting at a college campus was in 1966, when Charles Whitman climbed to the top of a tower at the University of Texas at Austin and shot 43 people, killing 13. In 2007, a disturbed student shot and killed 32 people at Virginia Tech.

The following is a far-from-comprehensive list of some of the other shootings in recent years that have claimed students’ and faculty members’ lives:

  • In 2014, a man who left a manifesto saying he wanted to attack sorority women killed six students from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
  • In 2015, 10 were killed and more were injured in a rampage at Umpqua Community College, in Oregon.
  • Also in 2015, four students were shot — one of them fatally — at Northern Arizona University.
  • In 2016, seven students at Valencia College were among those killed in a mass shooting at a gay club in Orlando.
  • Among those murdered at a Florida high school in February were one student who had committed to attending the University of Indianapolis and another who was bound for Lynn University. California has some of the most strict gun laws in the nation. Typical situations that used to be handled with a fist fight or shouting match are now often solved through gun fire or threats of gunfire.
    And before we pronounce that all we need are more guns to defend ourselves from other people with guns, consider the idiocy of that notion.

    Responding to a claim made by a California-based gun control group, I examined the list of state-wide gun control legislation going back into the 1980s. Regressions run on all of these, and giving a fairly long period of time for the laws to have an impact, showed no correlation. Even looking for common confounding variables showed no effect.

    What did work was targeting criminals (see Understanding California’s Crime Collapse | Why Gun Control Was Not A Factor | Gun Facts and Cali Crossroads | Why L.A. gang violence is key to California’s dropping crime rates | Gun Facts).

    Recapped briefly, two laws passed roughly at the same targeted criminal gun use (10–20-Life) and also repeat offenders (Three-Strikes), this latter group containing folks who have in the past, or who might well in the future evolve into gun-using criminals. Given the massive number of people taken off the streets, we see a significant correlation. A dearth of other variables associated with the slide leads me to think this was the primary contributor.

    California legislators pass laws of which they and their friends will be exempt. All these laws serve are those in office. They are designed to repress those whom have no intention of breaking the law.

    California legislators care only about being re-elected. If it means suppressing freedoms and liberties, they will do so. They do not care who they burn in the process. They know that life-long criminals will never obey the law. Therefore, the only option is to create the smoke and mirrors necessary to give the illusion that they are protecting you from people who do not, and will not become criminals. They are helpless against drug cartels and street gangs, therefore they bully those of us who do not break laws.

    Crime is caused by a constellation of factors.

    Availability of firearms has a very weak relationship to crime compared to factors like poverty, education, employment, drug abuse, etc.

    Political Junkie News Media
















Share this post on Facebook:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

This is a demo store for testing purposes — no orders shall be fulfilled. Dismiss