Trump’s Border Wall Plan Faces 3 Key Hurdles

Political Junkie News Media

March 27, 2017

President Donald Trump has now laid out exactly what he wants in the “big, beautiful wall” that he’s promised to build on the U.S.-Mexico border, his effort to build a huge hurdle to those entering the U.S. illegally faces impediments of its own.

It’s still not clear how Trump will pay for the wall that, as described in contracting notices, would be 30 feet (9 meters) high and easy on the eye for those looking at it from the north. The Trump administration will also have to contend with unfavorable geography and many legal battles.

A look at some of those obstacles:


Trump promised that Mexico would pay for his wall, a demand Mexico has repeatedly rejected. Trump’s first budget proposal to Congress, a preliminary draft that was light on details, asked lawmakers for a $2.6 billion down payment for the wall. An internal report prepared for Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly estimated that a wall along the entire border would cost about $21 billion. Congressional Republicans have estimated a more moderate price tag of $12 billion to $15 billion. Trump himself has suggested a cost of about $12 billion.

It’s unclear how much money Congress will approve. Lawmakers have been balking at his plans to sharply cut other federal spending to pay for the wall and other boosts to border security, while increasing military spending. White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters this past week that the administration was still looking at how the wall would be funded, adding that it hasn’t given up on Mexico footing the bill.


Roughly half of the 2,000-mile (3,200-kilometer) U.S.-Mexico border is in Texas and marked by the winding and twisting Rio Grande. A 1970 treaty with Mexico requires that anything built near that river not obstruct its flow. The same treaty applies to a stretch of border in Arizona, where the Colorado River marks the international boundary.

Some fencing that is already in place along the frontier is built well off the river, in some places nearly a mile (about a kilometer) away from the border.

Trump will have to navigate not only the treaty maintained by the International Boundary and Water Commission but also various environmental regulations that protect some stretches of border and restrict what kind of structures can be built and where. The contracting notices of March 17 say the Trump administration wants the wall dug at least 6 feet (almost 2 meters) into the ground. Along parts of the border in California, environmentally sensitive sand dunes required that a “floating fence” was built to allow the natural movement of the sand.


Nearly all of the land along the Texas border is privately held – much of it by people whose families have been in the region for generations – and buying their land won’t be easy, as Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama discovered. Lawyers for both administrations fought in court with private landowners. Obama’s efforts to buy privately held land in the Rio Grande Valley have carried over into Trump’s term.

The Trump administration appears to be preparing for the legal fight and included a request for more lawyers to handle such cases in its budget proposal. Spicer said this past week the administration would “take the steps necessary” to fulfill Trump’s promise to secure the southern border. Since he first made the pledge, walling off our neighbors to the south became an oft-repeated promise and rallying cry, both for the candidate and his supporters. Chants of “build that wall” thundered through arenas and convention halls. In at least one instance, Trump himself led the cheer. Building “an impenetrable physical wall on the southern border, on day one” is listed as item No. 1 on his “10 Point Plan to Put America First.”

Trump has proposed building a wall across what he initially said would be the entire 2,000 U.S.-Mexico border, though he has since reduced his estimate to 1,000 miles where a barrier may actually be beneficial. (Krikorian agrees with that part of Trump’s plan.) The real estate magnate has given varying estimates for the height of the wall in recent months, ranging from 30 feet to over 60 feet (and whenever Mexico does something he doesn’t like, the wall seems to get 10 feet higher) and in December said the wall would be made of concrete and steel.

Trump has clarified that he is flexible in his positions, meaning he may be open to revisiting his solid wall plan and instead look into putting up a fence through which border patrol agents can see.

Peter Nuñez, chairman of the board at the Center for Immigration Studies and former U.S. attorney in the southern district of California and assistant secretary of the treasury for enforcement in the U.S. Department of the Treasury under President George H.W. Bush, believes that’s the case.

As for Trump’s immigration plans, Nuñez says what’s on the White House’s website appeals much more to him than what the President discusses during rallies, debates and interviews.

  “It’s sort of bar-stool policy making.”








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *